The health care industry is massive and involves hundreds of deals that move numerous dollars daily. According to the National Healthcare Anti-Fraud Association, an estimated $100 billion is lost to Medicare fraudulence every year in the U.S., with ill-used law enforcement agencies depending heavily on whistleblowers to bring Medicare and Medicaid fraudulence, waste, and misuse to their focus.
This is why the federal government counts so heavily on whistleblowers to discover proof of dedicating Medicare fraud, which is why, under the qui tam provisions, the federal regulations protects whistleblowers from retaliation and offers such a rewarding economic motivation to blow the whistle on presumed fraud within the medical care system.
The anti-retaliation provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), is frequently considered even more protective of whistleblowers than various other statutes that offer an avenue for private citizens to report evidence of dedicating Medicare whistleblower rewards Oberheiden fraud or misbehavior to police and submit a qui tam suit.
Because it is so direct for employers to strike back versus medical care workers that blow the whistle on misconduct occurring within the company, whistleblower laws restrict work environment retaliation and provide the targets of it legal choice if it takes place anyway.
Also a whistleblower honor that is closer to 15 percent of the proceeds of the instance can be substantial, specifically if the situation is submitted under the False Claims Act. However, some of these legislations, like the False Claims Act, provide for greater problems and more payment than your typical wrongful termination insurance claim in an attempt to deter whistleblower retaliation.
This is why the federal government counts so heavily on whistleblowers to discover proof of dedicating Medicare fraud, which is why, under the qui tam provisions, the federal regulations protects whistleblowers from retaliation and offers such a rewarding economic motivation to blow the whistle on presumed fraud within the medical care system.
The anti-retaliation provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), is frequently considered even more protective of whistleblowers than various other statutes that offer an avenue for private citizens to report evidence of dedicating Medicare whistleblower rewards Oberheiden fraud or misbehavior to police and submit a qui tam suit.
Because it is so direct for employers to strike back versus medical care workers that blow the whistle on misconduct occurring within the company, whistleblower laws restrict work environment retaliation and provide the targets of it legal choice if it takes place anyway.
Also a whistleblower honor that is closer to 15 percent of the proceeds of the instance can be substantial, specifically if the situation is submitted under the False Claims Act. However, some of these legislations, like the False Claims Act, provide for greater problems and more payment than your typical wrongful termination insurance claim in an attempt to deter whistleblower retaliation.